test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #112

Neiland85 · 2025-12-13T14:11:07Z

test_security.py: 14 tests para security.py (0% -> 100%)
test_telemetry.py: 5 tests para telemetry.py (0% -> 81%)
test_logging.py: 8 tests para logging.py (32% -> 100%)
Cobertura total: 72% -> 96%
34 tests passing

🚀 Pull Request: Complete Railway Deployment Optimization

📋 Descripción del Cambio

Este PR implementa la solución completa para el problema de crashes de Railway después de 2 minutos, junto con la funcionalidad completa del dashboard administrativo para el sistema bancario NeuroBank FastAPI.

🎯 Problema Solucionado

❌ Problema: Aplicación crashes en Railway después de exactamente 2 minutos
❌ Problema: Botones y funcionalidades del admin dashboard no operativas
❌ Problema: Templates genéricos en lugar de específicos
❌ Problema: Configuración de despliegue incompleta

✅ Solución Implementada

✅ Railway Optimization Stack: Configuración completa anti-crash
✅ Admin Dashboard Completo: 100% funcional con interactividad JavaScript
✅ CI/CD Pipeline: GitHub Actions profesional de 8 etapas
✅ Performance: Optimización uvloop + single worker

🔧 Cambios Técnicos Implementados

🚂 Railway Deployment

[railway.json] Configuración con health checks y restart policies
[start.sh] Script de inicio inteligente con validaciones
[Dockerfile] Optimización single worker + uvloop
Resultado: Elimina crashes de 2 minutos

📊 Admin Dashboard

[admin_transactions.html] Panel transacciones completo con Chart.js
[admin_users.html] Gestión usuarios con búsqueda en tiempo real
[admin_reports.html] Reportes avanzados con exportación CSV/Excel
[router.py] Conexiones específicas (no más templates genéricos)
Resultado: 100% funcionalidad operativa

🔄 CI/CD Pipeline

[.github/workflows/production-pipeline.yml] Pipeline de 8 etapas
Etapas: Quality → Testing → Security → Frontend → Validation → Deploy → Monitor → Cleanup
Resultado: Despliegue automático profesional

📚 Documentation Suite

[HOTFIX_RAILWAY_CRASH.md] Análisis técnico del problema Railway
[WORKFLOW.md] Procedimientos de desarrollo
[GIT_COMMANDS_HOTFIX.md] Comandos de despliegue
Resultado: Documentación completa profesional

🧪 Testing & Validation

✅ Funcionalidad Validada

Admin Transactions: Búsqueda, filtros, paginación, exportación
Admin Users: CRUD completo, búsqueda en tiempo real
Admin Reports: Generación reportes, visualizaciones Chart.js
API Endpoints: Respuesta correcta de todos los endpoints
Railway Health: Endpoint /health operativo

🔒 Security Checks

Bandit security scan: Sin vulnerabilidades críticas
Trivy container scan: Imagen Docker segura
Environment variables: Protección de credenciales
Dependencies scan: Paquetes actualizados y seguros

⚡ Performance Tests

uvloop integration: Mejora performance async
Single worker config: Optimización memoria Railway
Static assets: Minificación CSS/JS
Database queries: Optimización consultas

🎯 Business Impact

Métrica	Antes	Después	Mejora
Railway Uptime	Crash 2min	100% estable	+∞%
Admin Functionality	0% operativo	100% funcional	+100%
Deployment Time	Manual	Automático	-80% tiempo
Code Quality	Sin validación	CI/CD completo	+100% confiabilidad

🚀 Deployment Instructions

Pre-merge Checklist

Todas las pruebas CI/CD pasan ✅
Review de código completado
Variables de entorno configuradas en Railway
RAILWAY_TOKEN configurado en GitHub Secrets

Post-merge Actions

Auto-deploy se activará automáticamente en main
Health check validará despliegue exitoso
Monitoring confirmará estabilidad post-deploy

👥 Review Requirements

🔍 Areas de Focus para Review

Railway Config: Validar railway.json y start.sh
Admin Templates: Verificar funcionalidad JavaScript
CI/CD Pipeline: Revisar configuración GitHub Actions
Security: Confirmar protección de variables de entorno

🎯 Expected Reviewers

@Neiland85 (Project Owner)
Backend/DevOps Team Member
Security Team Member (opcional)

📝 Additional Notes

🔄 Future Improvements

Monitoreo avanzado con métricas Railway
Tests automatizados para admin dashboard
Optimización adicional de performance

📚 Related Documentation

HOTFIX_RAILWAY_CRASH.md - Análisis técnico completo
WORKFLOW.md - Procedimientos de desarrollo
SOLUTION_STATUS_FINAL.md - Estado final del proyecto

✅ Ready to Merge Criteria

All CI/CD checks pass ✅
Code review approved by 1+ reviewers
Manual testing completed for admin dashboard
Railway deployment configuration validated
Documentation updated and complete

🎉 Este PR convierte NeuroBank FastAPI en una aplicación bancaria de nivel empresarial con despliegue automático y funcionalidad completa!

- test_security.py: 14 tests para security.py (0% -> 100%) - test_telemetry.py: 5 tests para telemetry.py (0% -> 81%) - test_logging.py: 8 tests para logging.py (32% -> 100%) - Cobertura total: 72% -> 96% - 34 tests passing

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR adds comprehensive test coverage for three core modules (security, telemetry, and logging), increasing overall test coverage from 72% to 96% with 34 passing tests. The tests are well-organized using class-based grouping and cover the main functionality of each module.

Added 14 tests for security.py covering configuration validation, key generation, and health checks
Added 5 tests for telemetry.py covering setup and request metrics logging
Added 8 tests for logging.py covering logger configuration and retrieval

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 13 comments.

File	Description
app/tests/test_telemetry.py	New test file with 5 tests covering telemetry setup and request metrics logging functionality
app/tests/test_security.py	New test file with 14 tests covering production config validation, secure key generation, and security health checks
app/tests/test_logging.py	New test file with 8 tests covering logging setup with different levels and logger retrieval

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:36Z

app/tests/test_telemetry.py

+                status_code=500,
+                duration_ms=100.0,
+            )
+        assert "500" in caplog.text or "GET" in caplog.text


The assertion here is too weak and doesn't verify the actual logged message. The test should verify that both the status code "500" AND the expected log information are present in the log output. The current assertion with "or" will pass even if only "GET" is found, which doesn't properly validate error logging behavior.

Suggested change

assert "500" in caplog.text or "GET" in caplog.text

assert "500" in caplog.text and "GET" in caplog.text

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:36Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+        env = {"CORS_ORIGINS": "*", "API_KEY": "", "SECRET_KEY": ""}
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):
+            os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)
+            os.environ.pop("SECRET_KEY", None)


Similar to the API_KEY test, this test has confusing environment manipulation. Setting environment variables to empty strings and then immediately popping them creates unnecessary complexity. Use a cleaner approach with clear=True in patch.dict or only use the pop operation.

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:36Z

app/tests/test_logging.py

+        # Verify only one handler exists
+        assert len(root.handlers) == 1


This test may not reliably verify handler cleanup behavior. After calling setup_logging(), the test asserts exactly 1 handler exists, but this doesn't necessarily prove that the dummy_handler was removed - it could be that setup_logging() removes all handlers and adds exactly 1 new one, or it could keep the dummy handler and not add a new one. The test should verify the handler identity or type to ensure proper cleanup occurred.

Suggested change

# Verify only one handler exists

assert len(root.handlers) == 1

# Verify only one handler exists and it's not the dummy handler

assert len(root.handlers) == 1

assert dummy_handler not in root.handlers

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:37Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+        env = {"SECRET_KEY": "test-secret", "API_KEY": ""}
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):
+            os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)


The test may not properly validate missing API_KEY behavior due to conftest.py setting default test environment variables. Even after popping API_KEY from os.environ, the patch.dict context only patches with the provided env dict and doesn't guarantee that API_KEY remains unset. The test should use clear=True in patch.dict to ensure complete isolation from conftest.py's default environment variables.

Suggested change

env = {"SECRET_KEY": "test-secret", "API_KEY": ""}

with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):

os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)

env = {"SECRET_KEY": "test-secret"}

with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:37Z

app/tests/test_logging.py

+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=False):
+            os.environ.pop("LOG_LEVEL", None)


This test may not reliably verify the default INFO level behavior. The conftest.py file sets LOG_LEVEL to "INFO" by default, so even after popping it from os.environ within the patch.dict context, the test may still be affected. Additionally, patch.dict with clear=False and an empty dict doesn't guarantee LOG_LEVEL is unset. Use clear=True or explicitly verify that LOG_LEVEL is not in os.environ after the pop.

Suggested change

with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=False):

os.environ.pop("LOG_LEVEL", None)

with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=True):

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:38Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):
+            os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)
+            os.environ.pop("SECRET_KEY", None)


Similar to test_missing_api_key, this test may not work correctly due to conftest.py setting default environment variables. The patch.dict with clear=False means the test environment from conftest.py may still interfere. Consider using clear=True to ensure the test properly validates the unhealthy status when API_KEY and SECRET_KEY are truly missing.

Suggested change

with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=False):

os.environ.pop("API_KEY", None)

os.environ.pop("SECRET_KEY", None)

with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:38Z

app/tests/test_logging.py

+import os
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+import pytest


Import of 'pytest' is not used.

Suggested change

import pytest

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:38Z

app/tests/test_security.py

+import os
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+import pytest


Import of 'pytest' is not used.

Suggested change

import pytest

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:38Z

app/tests/test_telemetry.py

+"""Tests for telemetry module."""
+
+import logging
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch


Import of 'MagicMock' is not used.
Import of 'patch' is not used.

Suggested change

from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch

Copilot · 2025-12-13T14:15:39Z

app/tests/test_telemetry.py

+import logging
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+
+import pytest


Import of 'pytest' is not used.

Suggested change

import pytest

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging

976cc02

- test_security.py: 14 tests para security.py (0% -> 100%) - test_telemetry.py: 5 tests para telemetry.py (0% -> 81%) - test_logging.py: 8 tests para logging.py (32% -> 100%) - Cobertura total: 72% -> 96% - 34 tests passing

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 13, 2025 14:11

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of Neiland85 December 13, 2025 14:11 View session

Neiland85 merged commit 24c3eb7 into main Dec 13, 2025
11 checks passed

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #112

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #112

Uh oh!

Neiland85 commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

	assert "500" in caplog.text or "GET" in caplog.text
	assert "500" in caplog.text and "GET" in caplog.text

		# Verify only one handler exists
		assert len(root.handlers) == 1

		with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=False):
		os.environ.pop("LOG_LEVEL", None)

	with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=False):
	os.environ.pop("LOG_LEVEL", None)
	with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=True):

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #112

test: añadir tests para security, telemetry y logging #112

Uh oh!

Conversation

Neiland85 commented Dec 13, 2025

🚀 Pull Request: Complete Railway Deployment Optimization

📋 Descripción del Cambio

🎯 Problema Solucionado

✅ Solución Implementada

🔧 Cambios Técnicos Implementados

🚂 Railway Deployment

📊 Admin Dashboard

🔄 CI/CD Pipeline

📚 Documentation Suite

🧪 Testing & Validation

✅ Funcionalidad Validada

🔒 Security Checks

⚡ Performance Tests

🎯 Business Impact

🚀 Deployment Instructions

Pre-merge Checklist

Post-merge Actions

👥 Review Requirements

🔍 Areas de Focus para Review

🎯 Expected Reviewers

📝 Additional Notes

🔄 Future Improvements

📚 Related Documentation

✅ Ready to Merge Criteria

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants